Judge Market LogoJudgeMarket
Rewards Invite Friends News Blog Builders Support
© 2026 JudgeMarket
AboutPrivacyTermsWhat is OPSNewsBlog
HomeWallet
← News

Supreme Court keeps Trump's mail ballot restrictions blocked for the midterms

PBS NewsHour + 11 others·58d ago·Politics
Donald TrumpDonald Trump38.1 Φ
Photo: PBS NewsHour

The US Supreme Court on Monday refused to let Donald Trump's restrictions on mail ballots take effect for the November midterms, leaving a lower-court block on the plan in place. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas publicly dissented from the brief order.

What would the plan have done? Trump signed an executive order in March, saying without evidence that mail voting is vulnerable to fraud. The plan would have required states to adopt a uniform envelope style and submit lists of eligible voters to an online portal, and the Postal Service could then refuse to deliver ballots for states that did not comply. A whistleblower report said millions of mail ballots might never be sent because the portal was not properly built. The ruling came a day after another federal judge, Carl Nichols, ruled against the order, the BBC reported.

What did the justices say? Justice Brett Kavanaugh said in a concurring opinion that the plan might ultimately prove legal, but that "state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections." Alito said in his dissent that the Postal Service "has broad authority to regulate the mail." Amy Howe, a SCOTUSblog co-founder, told PBS NewsHour the opinions probably leave the door open "at least a crack" for the administration to try again.

How did the president respond? In a lengthy social media post on Tuesday, Trump said justices who ruled against him "are not the people I interviewed to serve on the United States Supreme Court, they are merely a shell of their original selves." He called Alito and Thomas "legends both," PBS NewsHour reported. Kavanaugh is one of three justices Trump nominated, alongside Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. At a Rose Garden briefing, Attorney General Todd Blanche said the administration would comply with the ruling. "He is very frustrated," Blanche said of the president.

Who welcomed the ruling? California Governor Gavin Newsom, whose state led one of the lawsuits against the restrictions, said "today is a good day for democracy," DW reported. Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, whose state votes almost entirely by mail, called the decision "a major victory for Colorado and American democracy." House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries posted on X: "Democracy won. And far-right extremists lost," the Korea Times reported.


Figures referenced: Donald Trump. — JudgeMarket.

Sources

  • PBS NewsHourAnalyzing the Supreme Court's mail-in voting decision and Trump's reaction57d ago
  • PBS NewsHourWATCH: Blanche justifies Trump bashing Supreme Court over mail ballots: 'He is very frustrated'57d ago
  • The HillLive updates: Blanche insists Trump will follow ballot ruling; Kennedy Center loses bid to add Trump’s name57d ago
  • PBS NewsHourTrump attacks Supreme Court justices he picked for rejecting his push to restrict mail ballots57d ago
  • The HillTrump rips justices on mail-in ballots: ‘These are not the people I interviewed to serve’57d ago
  • PBS NewsHourWATCH: Attorney General Blanche addresses Trump's Supreme Court frustration, AI fears57d ago
  • Korea TimesUS Supreme Court blocks Trump mail-in ballot restrictions57d ago
  • PBS NewsHourSupreme Court rejects Trump mail ballot restrictions ahead of midterms58d ago
  • DWUS Supreme Court denies Trump bid to restrict mail ballots58d ago
  • BBCTrump criticises Supreme Court after justices block mail-in ballot restrictions58d ago
  • The HillSupreme Court won’t restore Trump’s mail-in voting plan for midterms58d ago
  • The HillSecond judge freezes Trump mail ballot plan as Supreme Court ruling looms58d ago